Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael J. Bowers, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Georgia
78 F.3d 499
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-03-08
- Topic
- commercial
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion December 20, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 70 F.3d 1218) Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael J. Bowers, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Georgia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
Michael E. Hobbs, Office of State Attorney General, Dorothy Yates Kirkley, Gregory R. Hanthorn and Diane G. Pulley, Jones, Day, Reavis Pogue, Atlanta, GA, for appellee.Page 500
Robert B. Remar, Kirwan, Goger, Chesin Parks, and Georgia Kay Lord, Atlanta, GA, for Amicus Georgia Psychological Association.
Kathleen M. Sullivan, Stanford, California, for Amicus AAUP, et al.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion December 20, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, ___ F.2d ___)
[2] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
- Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩