Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Warren Publishing, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Microdos Data Corp. Robert Payne, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants

67 F.3d 276

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-10-05
Topic
intellectual-property-and-technology

*277 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Warren Publishing, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Microdos Data Corp. Robert Payne, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
WARREN PUBLISHING, INC. v. MICRODOS DATA CORP.,67 F.3d 276(11th Cir. 1995)
WARREN PUBLISHING, INC., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. MICRODOS
DATA CORP.; ROBERT PAYNE, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants.
No. 93-8474
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
October 5, 1995
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Carl M. Davis, II, Kennedy Kennedy, Atlanta, GA, for appellants.

Joyce B. Klemmer, Smith Gambrell Russell, Atlanta, GA, for appellee.Page 277
[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
[2] (Opinion May 23, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995,52 F.2d 950)
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.fn*
BY THE COURT:
[3] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
  1. Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. Section(s) 46(c). ↩