Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
MILLER v. REGON PAROLE BD. POST PAROLE SUP., 636 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010)
Douglas Ray MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Or. PAROLE Bd. ANDPOST PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent-Appellee, & Post PrisonSupervision, Respondent., 636 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2011)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2011-02-02
- Topic
- general
MILLER v. REGON PAROLE BD. POST PAROLE SUP., 636 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010) Douglas Ray MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON PAROLE BOARD ANDPOST PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent-Appellee, and Post PrisonSupervision, Respondent. No. 07-36086.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MILLER v. REGON PAROLE BD. POST PAROLE SUP., 636 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MILLER v. REGON PAROLE BD. POST PAROLE SUP.,636 F.3d 1115(9th Cir. 2010)
Douglas Ray MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON PAROLE BOARD AND
POST PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent-Appellee, and Post Prison
Supervision, Respondent.
No. 07-36086.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 2, 2011.
Douglas Parks, Department of Justice, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: RICHARD A. PAEZ and RICHARD R. CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and LARRY A. BURNS,fn*District Judge.
ORDER
The Opinion filed on January 18, 2011,2011 WL 135041, is hereby withdrawn and vacated.
Within 14 days of the filing of this Order, each party shall submit a letter-brief addressing what effect, if any, the United States Supreme Court decision inSwarthout v.Cooke,562 U.S. ___,131 S.Ct. 859,178 L.Ed.2d 732(2011) has on this matter. The letter-briefs shall not exceed five pages.
The court will file a new disposition in due course.
- The Honorable Larry A. Burns, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern California, San Diego, sitting by designation. ↩