Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Valhal Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, Engineers, Appellant/cross-Appellee
Valhal Corp., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sullivan Assocs., Inc., Architects, Planners, Eng’rs, Appellant/cross-Appellee, 48 F.3d 760 (3d Cir. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-03-20
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- statement sur denial of petition for rehearing
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Valhal Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, Engineers, Appellant/cross-Appellee. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE and SAROKIN, Circuit Judges. McKEE, Circuit Judge.The petition for rehearing filed by appel-lee/cross-appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied. Judge Hutchinson would grant in banc rehearing for the reasons set forth in his at