Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. v. OGLES, 430 F.3d 1221 (9th Cir. 2005)
United States, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Gilbert OGLES,Defendant-Appellee. United States of Am., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JohnGilbert Ogles, Defendant-Appellant., 430 F.3d 1221 (9th Cir. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2005-11-16
- Topic
- general
U.S. v. OGLES, 430 F.3d 1221 (9th Cir. 2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Gilbert OGLES,Defendant-Appellee. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JohnGilbert Ogles, Defendant-Appellant.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. OGLES, 430 F.3d 1221 (9th Cir. 2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
U.S. v. OGLES,430 F.3d 1221(9th Cir. 2005)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Gilbert OGLES,
Defendant-Appellee. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John
Gilbert Ogles, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 03-10439, 04-10069.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
November 16, 2005.
Richard E. Gardiner, Fairfax, VA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.Page 1222
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.