Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Landrigan v. Stewart

Landrigan v. Stewart, 397 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2005)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2005-02-14
Topic
general

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2005 CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JEFFREY TIMOTHY LANDRIGAN, a.k.a. No. 00-99011 Billy Patrick Wayne Hill, D.C. No.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Landrigan v. Stewart. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
7 opinions

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Silverman was recused.