Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Nat’l Mediation Bd., 38 F.3d 1224 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1994)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-07-20
- Topic
- general
ORDER PER CURIAM. It is ORDERED by the Court that the opinion of July 19, 1994 in the above entitled case is amended as follows: On page 658, “Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Williams” should be amended to read: Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Williams, with whom Circuit Judges Silber-man, Ginsburg and Henderson join. On page 673 of Judge Williams’ dissent, the first line should be amended to read: Williams, Circuit Judge, dissenting, • in which Silberman, Ginsburg and Henderson, Circuit Judges join:
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
ORDER
PER CURIAM.It is ORDERED by the Court that the opinion of July 19, 1994 in the above entitled case is amended as follows:
On page 658, “Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Williams” should be amended to read:
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Williams, with whom Circuit Judges Silber-man, Ginsburg and Henderson join.
On page 673 of Judge Williams’ dissent, the first line should be amended to read:
Williams, Circuit Judge, dissenting, • in which Silberman, Ginsburg and Henderson, Circuit Judges join: