Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Salazar-Paucar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
290 F.3d 964
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2002-05-09
- Topic
- general
PAEZ, Circuit Judge. ORDER The opinion of this court filed in this case on February 28, 2002, slip op. at 3329 (281 F.3d 1069), is amended as follows: At slip op. at 3346, first full paragraph after “V. CONCLUSION,” delete “for a grant of asylum,” and replace with “for the Attorney General to exercise his discretion whether to grant Petitioner asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1); Duarte de Guinac v. INS, 179 F.3d 1156, 1164 (9th Cir.1999).” Delete “also” in the following sentence, to read: “The application for withholding of deportation is granted.” With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny panel rehear*965ing. The petition for panel rehearing in 99-71306 is denied.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Salazar-Paucar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
James A. Hunolt, Heather R. Phillips, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for the respondent.
At slip op. at 3346, first full paragraph after"V.CONCLUSION,"delete "for a grant of asylum," and replace with "for the Attorney General to exercise his discretion whether to grant Petitioner asylum.8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1);Duarte de Guinacv. INS,179 F.3d 1156,1164(9th Cir. 1999)."
Delete "also" in the following sentence, to read: "The application for withholding of deportation is granted."
With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny panel rehearing.Page 965The petition for panel rehearing in 99-71306 is denied.