Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Jose Trinidad Chavez-Valenzuela
279 F.3d 1062
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2002-02-08
- Topic
- general
ORDER The opinion filed October 15, 2001, is amended as follows: At slip op. 14532, lines 31-32, replace “more than seven minutes and” with “some time, including the seven minute period when he was.” At slip op. 14539, line 5, insert footnote 7 after “... search.” 7 Had the detention and questioning of Chavez-Valenzuela not exceeded the proper scope of the initial stop, the vol-untariness of his consent to search his car would be properly addressed according to the factors set forth in United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1082 (9th Cir.1989). See also Murillo, 255 F.3d at 1175; Perez, 37 F.3d at 515.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Jose Trinidad Chavez-Valenzuela. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 31 opinions
ORDER
The opinion filed October 15, 2001, is amended as follows:
At slip op. 14532, lines 31-32, replace “more than seven minutes and” with “some time, including the seven minute period when he was.”
At slip op. 14539, line 5, insert footnote 7 after “... search.”
7 Had the detention and questioning of Chavez-Valenzuela not exceeded the proper scope of the initial stop, the vol-untariness of his consent to search his car would be properly addressed according to the factors set forth in United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1082 (9th Cir.1989). See also Murillo, 255 F.3d at 1175; Perez, 37 F.3d at 515.