Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Moore v. City of Harriman

218 F.3d 555

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2000-09-12
Topic
general

ORDER A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows: “The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.” Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. *556It is FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Tuesday, October 10, 2000 and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Tuesday, November 7, 2000. The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moore v. City of Harriman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
MOORE v. CITY OF HARRIMAN,218 F.3d 555(6th Cir. 2000)
RALPH MOORE, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF HARRIMAN; HARRIMAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT; ROY JENKINS, CHIEF OF POLICE; DARREN McBROOM; TERRY FINK; RANDY
HEIDLE; VIRGIL McCART; AND JERRY SINGLETON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 99-5258.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
September 12, 2000.
Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."
Page 556

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Tuesday, October 10, 2000 and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Tuesday, November 7, 2000.

The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the court.