Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

Resol. Tr. Corp. v. Dunmar Corp., 20 F.3d 397 (11th Cir. 1994)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-04-12
Topic
general

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en bane. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. v. DUNMAR CORP.,20 F.3d 397(11th Cir. 1994)
RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., PLAINTIFF, v. DUNMAR CORP. AND MICHAEL D. JONES,
DEFENDANTS-COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS, THE FIRST F.A., DEFENDANT-COUNTERCLAIM
DEFENDANT, SHERMAN DANTZLER AND JACK SHIREK, DEFENDANTS,
AND
THE FIRST F.A. OF ORLANDO AND RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., COUNTER-DEFENDANTS.
MICHAEL D. JONES; ROBERT S. GUSKIEWICZ; R.S. FUTCH, JR.,
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., DEFENDANT-THIRD PARTY
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. PHILIP DONLEVY; WILLIAM CRAWFORD; ROBERT STONE,
DEFENDANTS, v. SEMINOLE FLYING AND SOARING, INC., AND THE FIRST F.A. OF
ORLANDO, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., PLAINTIFF-COUNTER DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, v. LAKE
PICKETT, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; MICHAEL D. JONES, AS GENERAL
PARTNER, D/B/A LAKE PICKETT, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; MICHAEL D.
JONES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE,
DEFENDANTS-COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, THE FIRST F.A. OF ORLANDO,
DEFENDANT.
No. 91-3924.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 12, 1994.
Broad and Cassel, Brenda Lee London, Robert D. Gatton, Orlando, FL, for appellants.Page 398

Giles, Hedrick Robinson, P.A., Orlando, FL, E. Givens Goodspeed, Kirk K. Van Tine, Baker Botts, Washington, DC, for appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Nos. 89-205-Civ-Orl-19, 89-207-Civ-Orl-19, 89-208-Civ-Orl-19), Patricia C. Fawsett, Judge.
[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
[2] (Opinion November 23, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993,7 F.3d 1006)
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
[3] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.