Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

183 F.3d 1290

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-08-11
Topic
general

BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
McANDREW v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,183 F.3d 1290(11th Cir. 1999)
ROBERT E. McANDREW, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED
MARTIN CORPORATION, Successor in Interest to LOCKHEED-AERONAUTICAL
SYSTEMS COMPANY, a division of LOCKHEED CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, J. A. BLACKWELL, JR., T. A.
GRAHAM, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-8483
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
DECIDED August 11, 1999
Christopher G. Moorman, James Lee Ford, The Ford Law Firm, Atlanta, GA, for McAndrew

Todd D. Wozniak, H. Lane Dennard, Jr., King Spalding, Atlanta, GA, for Blackwell, Powell, Goldfarb and McLellan.

Richard W. Hendrix, Finch, McCranie, Brown, Hendrix Sullivan, Atlanta, GA, for Graham.

Edmund M. Kneisel, Neal S. Berinhout, William H. Boice, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Lockheed.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, D.C. Docket No. 96-CV-1584-JOF.
(Opinion June 18, 1999,177 F.3d 131011th Cir., 1999)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUSfn*, Circuit Judges.Page 1291
BY THE COURT:
[1] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
  1. Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩