Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

169 F.3d 215

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-02-26
Topic
general

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT: A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en bane with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
WILLIAMS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.,169 F.3d 215(5th Cir. 1999)
JULIE DEFFENBAUGH WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT, v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC, ET AL, DEFENDANTS WAL-MART STORES, INC
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE
No. 97-10685
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 26, 1999
Mark C. Brodeur, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant.

Jimmy Preston Wrotenbery, Kevin D. Jewell, Magenheim, Bateman, Robinson, Wrotenbery Helfand, Houston, TX for Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[2] (Opinion September 24, 1998, 5 Cir., 1998, ___ F.3d ___)
Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.fn*
BY THE COURT:
[3] A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
  1. Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this decision. ↩