Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.

165 F.3d 1209

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-01-29
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Chief Judge Bowman, Judge Richard S. Arnold, Judge Fagg, Judge Morris S. Arnold, and Judge Murphy would affirm the order of the district court rejecting Weaselhead’s claim of double jeopardy and denying his motion to dismiss Count III of the superseding indictment. Judge McMillian, Judge Wollman, Judge Beam, Judge Loken, and Judge Hansen would reverse that order.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
6 opinions
UNITED STATES v. WEASELHEAD,165 F.3d 1209(8th Cir. 1999)
United States of America, Appellee, v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.,
Appellant.
No. 97-4397
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted January 11, 1999
Filed January 29, 1999
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, WOLLMAN, BEAM, LOKEN, HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, En Banc.

Prior report:156 F.3d 818
PER CURIAM.
[1] Chief Judge Bowman, Judge Richard S. Arnold, Judge Fagg, Judge Morris S. Arnold, and Judge Murphy would affirm the order of the district court rejecting Weaselhead's claim of double jeopardy and denying his motion to dismiss Count III of the superseding indictment. Judge McMillian, Judge Wollman, Judge Beam, Judge Loken, and Judge Hansen would reverse that order.

[2] By the vote of an equally divided Court, the order of the district court is affirmed.