Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mauro v. Arpaio

162 F.3d 547

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-12-02
Topic
bankruptcy

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021, slip op. at 10013 (9th Cir. Sept. 1,1998), is withdrawn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mauro v. Arpaio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021, slip op. at 10013 (9th Cir. Sept. 1,1998), is withdrawn.