Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205, and Theodore Biondo, Intervenors-Appellants

153 F.3d 834

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-09-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Last year we consolidated and decided nine appeals and one petition for mandamus arising from the remedial phase of the long-running litigation over racial segregation in the public school system of Rockford, Illinois. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, 111 F.3d 528 (7th Cir.1997). We remarked that the “flurry of appeals” in the case was “threatening to become an avalanche,” and so we directed that future appeals be directed to this panel.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205, and Theodore Biondo, Intervenors-Appellants. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
PEOPLE WHO CARE v. ROCKFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION,153 F.3d 834(7th Cir. 1998)
People Who Care, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Rockford Board of
Education, School District No. 205, Defendant-Appellant, and Theodore
Biondo, et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
Nos. 98-1056, 98-1105, 98-1231, 98-1449, 98-2452, 98-2488
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
SUBMITTED AUGUST 26, 1998
DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1998
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division.

No. 89 C 20168 — P. Michael Mahoney, Magistrate Judge.
Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL, for Larry Hoarde and Chasty Hoarde in dockets 98-1056, 98-1105.

Amy E. Shappert, Lord, Bissell Brook, Rockford, IL; Jeffry S. Spears, Hinshaw Culbertson, Rockford, IL; Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL, for Stephanie Burfield in dockets 98-1056, 98-2488.

Robert C. Howard, Futterman Howard, Chicago, IL; Eugene Eubanks, Doctor, Kansas City, MO; Denise Reid Hoggard, Little Rock, AR; Jennifer L. Fischer, Chicago, IL, for People Who Care in docket 98-1056.

Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL, for Jonathan Hughes in dockets 98-1056, 98-1105, 98-2488.

Stephen R. Swofford, Nancy G. Lischer, Hinshaw Culbertson, Chicago, IL; William J. Quinlan, Rockford Public Schools, Rockland, IL; Anthony G. Scariano, Kula, Ellch Himes, Chicago Heights, IL, for Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205 in docket 98-1056.

David Faulkner, Lord, Bissell Brook, Rockford, IL; Jeffry S. Spears, Hinshaw Culberston, Rockford, IL; Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL, for Stephanie Burfield in dockets 98-1105, 98-1231.

Robert C. Howard, Futterman Howard, Chicago, IL; Eugene Eubanks, Doctor, Kansas City, MO; Denise Reid Hoggard, Little Rock, AR; Jennifer L. Fischer, Chicago, IL, for People Who Care in docket 98-1105.

Stephen R. Swofford, Nancy G. Lischer, Hinshaw Culbertson, Chicago, IL; A. Lynn Himes, Scariano, Kula, Ellch Himes, Chicago, IL, William J. Quinlan, Rockford Public Schools, Rockland, IL; John M. Izzo, Scariano, Kula, Ellch Himes, Chicago, IL, for Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205 in docket 98-1105.

Ronald L. Futterman, Robert C. Howard, Futterman Howard, Chicago, IL, Eugene Eubanks, Doctor, Kansas City, MO; Robert E. Lehrer, Lehrer Redleaf, Chicago, IL; Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL; Janet Pulliam, Little Rock, AR, for People Who Care in dockets 98-1231, 98-1449.

Robert E. Lehrer, Lehrer Redleaf, Chicago, IL; Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL; for Larry Hoarde, Chasty Hoarde, minors andPage 835Jonathan Hughes, a minor in dockets 98-1231, 98-1449.

Nancy G. Lischer, Hinshaw Culbertson, Chicago, IL; Anthony G. Scariano, Kula, Ellch Himes, Chicago, IL, William J. Quinlan, Rockford Public Schools, Rockland, IL; David P. Kula, Scariano, Kula, Ellch Himes, Chicago Heights, IL, for Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205 in docket 98-1231.

David Faulkner, Lord, Bissell Brook, Rockford, IL; Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL, for Stephanie Burfield in docket 98-1449.

Nancy G. Lischer, Hinshaw Culbertson, Chicago, IL; Anthony G. Scariano, Kula, Ellch Himes, Chicago, IL, William J. Quinlan, Rockford Public Schools, Rockland, IL, for Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205 in docket 98-1449.

Robert C. Howard, Futterman Howard, Chicago, IL; Robert E. Lehrer, Lehrer Redleaf, Chicago, IL; Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL; for Larry Hoarde, Chasty Hoarde, and Jonathan Hughes in docket 98-2452.

Amy E. Shappert, Lord, Bissell Brook, Rockford, IL; Jeffry S. Spears, Hinshaw Culbertson, Rockford, IL; Robert E. Lehrer, Lehrer Redleaf, Chicago, IL; Jonathan A. Rothstein, Gessler, Hughes Socol, Chicago, IL; for Stephanie Burfield in docket 98-2452.

Robert C. Howard, Futterman Howard, Chicago, IL; Eugene Eubanks, Doctor, Kansas City, MO; Robert E. Lehrer, Lehrer Redleaf, Chicago, IL; Denise Reid Hoggard, Little Rock, AR; Jennifer L. Fischer, Chicago, IL; Venita Hervey, Futterman Howard, Rockford, IL, for People Who Care in docket 98-2452.

Peter D. Debruyne, Debruyne, Yalen Olsen, Rockford, IL; Peter Alexander, Rockford, IL, for Theodore Biondo, Patricia Delugas and David L. Strommer in docket 98-2452.

Ronald L. Futterman, Futterman Howard, Chicago, IL; Eugene Eubanks, Doctor, Kansas City, MO; Denise Reid Hoggard, Little Rock, AR; Jennifer L. Fischer, Chicago, IL; for People Who Care in docket 98-2488.

William J. Quinlan, Rockford Public Schools, Rockland, IL; Thomas J. Lester, Hinshaw Culbertson, Rockford, IL; Anthony G. Scariano, Scariano, Scariano, Kula, Ellch Himes, Chicago, IL; for Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205 in docket 98-2488.
Before Posner, Chief Judge, and Bauer and Kanne, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
[1] Last year we consolidated and decided nine appeals and one petition for mandamus arising from the remedial phase of the long-running litigation over racial segregation in the public school system of Rockford, Illinois. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education,111 F.3d 528(7th Cir. 1997). We remarked that the "flurry of appeals" in the case was "threatening to become an avalanche," and so we directed that future appeals be directed to this panel. Id. at 532. The avalanche is almost upon us. Already this year six more appeals have been filed, and there is no end in sight. We are faced with a substantial problem of managing our own docket, but more worrisome still is the failure of the parties, and, it seems, the magistrate judge and the special master who is assisting him, to heed the admonition of the Supreme Court, see Missouri v. Jenkins,515 U.S. 70,99(1995); Board of Education v. Dowell,498 U.S. 237,248(1991), which we have repeated, United States v. Board of School Commissioners,128 F.3d 507,510(7th Cir. 1997), to bend every effort to winding up school litigation and returning the operation of the schools to the local school authorities.

[2] In an effort to render the appeal process manageable by us, and to put the case on the road to an early final resolution, we hereby direct each of the parties to file within thirty days of today a status report containing the following information:
1. The total number of appeals that have been filed to date in this litigation, listing each appeal separately by appellate docket number and by date filed and (if applicable) decided.
2. An estimate of the number of appeals that will be filed in this litigation in the remainder of 1998, in 1999, and in 2000.
Page 836
3. An estimate of when the decree (the "comprehensive remedial order") entered in this litigation will be dissolved, and a statement of the efforts that the parties have made and are making to bring about the termination of the litigation and the return of control of the Rockford public schools to Rockford.
4. The total amount of attorney fees incurred by the parties to this date that have been or are expected to be defrayed out of public funds, together with an estimate of the attorney fees that the parties expect to incur between now and the completion of the litigation.


[3] We further direct that the five pending appeals in which the same parties are on both sides of the appeal shall be consolidated and treated as a single appeal for purposes of briefing and oral argument. The briefs that have been filed in these cases are hereby stricken and the Rockford Board of Education (the appellant in these cases) is directed to file its consolidated brief within thirty days of today.

[4] So Ordered.