Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Shari L. LYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA, Cinthia Becton, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

136 F.3d 1295

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-03-11
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "The existence of a Title VII 'employer' is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit under the statute." (citing Virgo v. Riviera Beach Assocs., Ltd., 30 F.3d 1350, 1359 (11th Cir.1994) (citing McKenzie ))

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Shari L. LYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA, Cinthia Becton, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
15 opinions
LYES v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH,136 F.3d 1295(11th Cir. 1998)
Shari L. LYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA,
Cinthia Becton, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-4577.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Decided March 11, 1998.
Michael J. McHale, Daves, Whalen, McHale Considine, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard Hunt McDuff, Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke George, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale,Page 1296FL, for City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency.

Glen J. Torcivia, West Palm Beach, FL, for City of Riviera Beach, FL, and others.

Robin L. Rosenberg, West Palm Beach, FL, for Neil Crilly.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 95-8285-CIV-KLR), Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

(Opinion November 5, 1997, 11th Cir.,126 F.3d 1380).
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.1
BY THE COURT:
[1] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[2] IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.Page 1434
  1. Judge Rosemary Barkett has recused herself and will not participate. Senior Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩