Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Waters v. Zant
11 F.3d 139
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-12-22
- Topic
- general
BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for reheáring en banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. The *140previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Waters v. Zant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
WATERS v. ZANT,11 F.3d 139(11th Cir. 1993)
EURUS KELLY WATERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WALTER ZANT, WARDEN, GEORGIA
DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.
No. 88-8935.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
December 22, 1993.
Paula Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, GA, for respondent-appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.fn*
(Panel Opinion December 9, 1992, 11th Cir., 1992, 979 F.2d 1473)
[2] IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. ThePage 140previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
- Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Thomas A. Clark has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩