Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel Hulett
108 F.3d 981
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-03-25
- Topic
- litigation
ORDER The order filed January 13, 1997, is ordered PUBLISHED. ORDER January 13, 1997 The opinion filed September 6, 1996, is amended as follows: 1) In the reported opinion, at 96 F.3d 359, 363 (9th Cir.1996), add the following sentence to the end of the first partial paragraph: “Nominal damages” is not limited to an award in the amount of $1, but includes an award that may properly be classified as “de minimis.” ... With this amendment to the opinion, a majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel Hulett. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
ORDER
The order filed January 13, 1997, is ordered PUBLISHED.
ORDER
January 13, 1997
The opinion filed September 6, 1996, is amended as follows:
1) In the reported opinion, at 96 F.3d 359, 363 (9th Cir.1996), add the following sentence to the end of the first partial paragraph:
“Nominal damages” is not limited to an award in the amount of $1, but includes an award that may properly be classified as “de minimis.” ...
With this amendment to the opinion, a majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor or . rehearing en banc. Fed.RApp.P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.