Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

U.S. v. TUCKER, 991 F.2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1993)

United States, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HOMER LEE TUCKER,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT., 991 F.2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1993)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1993-05-13
Topic: general

U.S. v. TUCKER, 991 F.2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1993) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HOMER LEE TUCKER,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. No. 87-5090.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 13, 1993.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. TUCKER, 991 F.2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

U.S. v. TUCKER,991 F.2d 1518(9th Cir. 1993)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HOMER LEE TUCKER,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 87-5090.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 13, 1993.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, itPage 1519is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.Page 442