Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Thigpen

989 F.2d 1116

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1993-04-09
Topic: bankruptcy

BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be heard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be heard by this court sitting en banc, together with 91-8082, United States v. Herman Campbell Barnett, Jr. *1117On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Harold L. Murphy, Judge.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Thigpen. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

UNITED STATES v. THIGPEN,989 F.2d 1116(11th Cir. 1993)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLIAM JAMES THIGPEN,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HERMAN CAMPBELL BARNETT,

JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Nos. 91-3236, 91-8082.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 9, 1993.

William M. Kent, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Jacksonville, FL for Thigpen.

Mark Devereaux, U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, FL, for U.S. in No. 91-3236.

John R. Martin, Atlanta, GA, Nancy C. Rogers, Decatur, GA, for Barnett.

Michael J. O'Leary, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for U.S. in No. 91-8082.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; John H. Moore, II, Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

[1] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be heard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

[2] IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be heard by this court sitting en banc together with 91-8082.United States v. HermanCampbell Barnett. Jr.,Page 1117

[3] On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Harold L. Murphy, Judge.

[4] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[5] (Opinion August 18, 1992 11th Cir., 1992,968 F.2d 1189)

[6] Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

[7] BY THE COURT:

[8] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

[9] IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court sitting en banc. The previous panel opinion is hereby VACATED.