Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Parents for Quality Education With Integration, Inc. v. Indiana
986 F.2d 206
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-02-18
- Topic
- general
ORDER ON REHEARING The State of Indiana is not, under the Eleventh Amendment, a proper defendant and is hereby dismissed. The opinion of the court issued October 23, 1992, 977 F.2d 1207; is hereby modified as provided in this order. On page 3 of the opinion, 14 lines from the top, delete the parenthetical reading: (the State of Indiana and state officials) On further consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Parents for Quality Education With Integration, Inc. v. Indiana. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
[3] The opinion of the court issued October 23, 1992,977 F.2d 1207, is hereby modified as provided in this order.
[4] On page 3 of the opinion, 14 lines from the top, delete the parenthetical reading:
[5](the State of Indiana and state officials)
[6] On further consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearingen banc,no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. Accordingly,
[7] IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.Page 207
- Hon. S. Hugh Dillin, of the Southern District of Indiana, is sitting by designation. ↩