Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Carter v. Derwinski

970 F.2d 662

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1992-07-30
Topic: bankruptcy

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carter v. Derwinski. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

CARTER v. DERWINSKI,970 F.2d 662(9th Cir. 1992)

DALE L. CARTER; DAVID A. JOHNSON; FRED EMERY; JAMES R. STRAW, ON BEHALF OF

ALL IN THE STATE OF IDAHO SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v.

EDWARD J. DERWINSKI, SECRETARY, OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, OR

HIS SUCCESSOR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 91-35530.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 30, 1992.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.Page 733