Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

IN THE MATTER OF FEERMAN, 96 F.2d 1017 (2nd Cir. 1938)

In the Matter of Herman FEERMAN, Bankrupt. Herman FEERMAN, Appellant, v.William SCHWARTZ, Doing Bus. under the Firm Name & Style of SchwartzBros., Appellee., 96 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1938)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1938-05-02
Topic: general

IN THE MATTER OF FEERMAN, 96 F.2d 1017 (2nd Cir. 1938) In the Matter of Herman FEERMAN, Bankrupt. Herman FEERMAN, Appellant, v.William SCHWARTZ, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of SchwartzBros., Appellee. No. 318.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 2, 1938. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IN THE MATTER OF FEERMAN, 96 F.2d 1017 (2nd Cir. 1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IN THE MATTER OF FEERMAN,96 F.2d 1017(2nd Cir. 1938)

In the Matter of Herman FEERMAN, Bankrupt. Herman FEERMAN, Appellant, v.

William SCHWARTZ, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Schwartz

Bros., Appellee.

No. 318.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 2, 1938.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Mintzer Todarelli, of New York City (David Coral, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

William J. Rudin, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellee.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.