Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George Proper
Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. U. (periodical titles) Students Co-Operative Ass’n George Proper, 952 F.2d 1566 (9th Cir. 1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-01-10
- Topic
- bankruptcy
ORDER Prior report: 9th Cir., 939 F.2d 808. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George Proper. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
ORDER
Prior report: 9th Cir., 939 F.2d 808.
Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.