Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Lance Jon Jordan

United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, & Lance Jon Jordan, 948 F.2d 934 (5th Cir. 1991)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1991-12-03
Topic: estate-planning

How later courts describe this case

passengers of an automobile who did not claim a possessory or ownership interest in the automobile or its contents had no standing to object to the search of the automobile or its other passengers

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Lance Jon Jordan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 9 opinions

UNITED STATES v. GREER,948 F.2d 934(5th Cir. 1991)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CHRISTOPHER BARRY GREER,

DANIEL ALVIS WOOD, SEAN CHRISTIAN TARRANT, MICHAEL LEWIS LAWRENCE, AND LANCE

JON JORDAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

No. 90-1348.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 3, 1991.

Jeb Loveless, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Tarrant.Page 935

James M. Murphy, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Greer.

J. Craig Jett, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Wood.

R. Kristin Weaver, Dallas, Tex., for Jordan.

Blake Withrow, Dallas, Tex., for Lawrence.

David L. Botsford, Alvis, Carssow, Cummins, Hoeffner Botsford, Austin, Tex., for amicus curiae, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Assoc.

Lisa J. Stark, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

[1] ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[2] (Opinion August 13, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991,939 F.2d 1076)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

[3] A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.