Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. GILKES, 94 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir. 1938)

YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. Mildred Winifred GILKES., 94 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir. 1938)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1938-02-28
Topic: general

YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. GILKES, 94 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir. 1938) YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. Mildred Winifred GILKES. No. 8638.Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 28, 1938.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. GILKES, 94 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir. 1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. GILKES,94 F.2d 1023(9th Cir. 1938)

YOUNG BROS., LTD., v. Mildred Winifred GILKES.

No. 8638.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 28, 1938.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Territory of Hawaii; Edward M. Watson, Judge.

Frank E. Thompson, of Honolulu, T.H., and John H. Black and James M. Wallace, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

E.J. Botts and Fred Patterson, both of Honolulu, T.H., and Herbert Chamberlin, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court herein issue forthwith.Page 1