Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.

Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 926 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1991)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1991-03-28
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court’s dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga.1990). AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

926 F.2d 1573

Oliver M. BOND and Herta R. Bond, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
OCTAGON PROCESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-8898.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 28, 1991.

E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Duross Fitzpatrick, District Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court's dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga.1990).

AFFIRMED.