Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Restrepo
912 F.2d 1568
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-09-06
- Topic
- bankruptcy
ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Restrepo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
UNITED STATES v. RESTREPO,912 F.2d 1568(9th Cir. 1990)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DARIO RESTREPO,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 88-3207.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
September 6, 1990.
Page 1569
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, HOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
[1] ORDER
[2] Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecaused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.Page 180