Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Transco Leasing Corp. v. United States

Transco Leasing Corp. v. United States, 905 F.2d 61 (5th Cir. 1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-06-12
Topic
general

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING (Opinion March 26, 1990, 5th Cir. 896 F.2d 1435) Before LIVELY *, JOLLY, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing filed by the United States is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for panel rehearing filed by Mrs. Ahart and Mrs. Manuel are granted in part.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Transco Leasing Corp. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
TRANSCO LEASING CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES,905 F.2d 61(5th Cir. 1990)
TRANSCO LEASING CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
FIRST WICHITA NATIONAL BANK, ET AL., APPELLANTS-APPELLEES, v. BRENDA MANUEL,
AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WAYNE MANUEL, ET AL., CYNTHIA MANUEL AHART,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF STEVEN R. AHART, ET AL.,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN EXCESS UNDERWRITERS, INC., CYNTHIA MANUEL
AHART, AS SUCCESSION REPRESENTATIVE AND CURATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF STEVEN R.
AHART, STANDARD FITTINGS CORPORATION, AND TRANSCO LEASING CORPORATION,
APPELLEES-APPELLANTS.
No. 88-1823.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 12, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Robert B. Maloney, Judge.
[1] ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
[2] (Opinion March 26, 1990, 5th Cir.896 F.2d 1435)
Before LIVELYfn*, JOLLY, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[3] IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing filed by the United States is hereby DENIED.

[4] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for panel rehearing filed by Mrs. Ahart and Mrs. Manuel are granted in part. The mandate of this court is hereby amended to authorize the award of post-judgment interest pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1961and31 U.S.C. § 1304(b)(1)(A).See Brooks v. United States,757 F.2d 734,740-41(5th Cir. 1985). In all other respects, the petitions for panel rehearing filed by Mrs. Ahart and Mrs. Manuel are DENIED.
  1. Circuit Judge of the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. ↩