Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Gilbertson v. Arnheim

895 F.2d 1417

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-02-05
Topic
general

895 F.2d 1417 Gilbertson (John, Janice) v. Arnheim (Anders G.), Alanthus Corp., f/k/a Technology Finance Group, Inc., Computer Value Assoc., American Computer Equipment Leasing, Leasing Consultants Associates, Gordon S. Rosen Associates, Inc., McKenna (William), Texcom Equipment Corp., Heitmeyer (Richard A.), Wellbrock (Richard D.), Ward (William B.) NO. 88-4100 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. FEB 05, 1990 1 Appeal From: D.Or. 2 REVERSED. 3 (The decision of the Court is referenced in a 'Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions' appearing in the Federal Reporter. The Ninth Circuit provides by rule that dispositions that do not meet specified criteria shall not be published, and that an unpublished disposition shall not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gilbertson v. Arnheim. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

895 F.2d 1417

Gilbertson (John, Janice)
v.
Arnheim (Anders G.), Alanthus Corp., f/k/a Technology
Finance Group, Inc., Computer Value Assoc., American
Computer Equipment Leasing, Leasing Consultants Associates,
Gordon S. Rosen Associates, Inc., McKenna (William), Texcom
Equipment Corp., Heitmeyer (Richard A.), Wellbrock (Richard
D.), Ward (William B.)

NO. 88-4100

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

FEB 05, 1990

1

Appeal From: D.Or.

2

REVERSED.

3

(The decision of the Court is referenced in a 'Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions' appearing in the Federal Reporter. The Ninth Circuit provides by rule that dispositions that do not meet specified criteria shall not be published, and that an unpublished disposition shall not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ninth Circuit Rules, Rule 36-3, 28 U.S.C.A.)