Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Terrell McGINNIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INGRAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant

895 F.2d 1303

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-02-06
Topic
general

*1304 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of June 11, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Terrell McGINNIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INGRAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
McGINNIS v. INGRAM EQUIPMENT CO., INC.,895 F.2d 1303(11th Cir. 1990)
TERRELL McGINNIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. INGRAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 88-7596.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
February 6, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.fn*Page 1304
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion November 14, 1989, 11th Cir.,888 F.2d 109)
BY THE COURT:
[1] A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[2] IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en bancwithoral argument during the week of June 11, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
  1. Senior U.S. Circuit Judge James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩