Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Sun Studs, Inc. v. ATA Equipment Leasing, Inc.

Sun Studs, Inc. v. ATA Equip. Leasing, Inc., 892 F.2d 73 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-12-20
Topic
general

ORDER Upon further consideration of the suggestion for rehearing in banc that was accepted on August 16,1989, 882 F.2d 1583, it now appearing that the acceptance was improvident, IT IS ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, declined. The court’s opinion issued on March 31, 1989, appearing at 872 F.2d 978, as modified by order on July 3, 1989, 872 F.2d 994, is reinstated.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sun Studs, Inc. v. ATA Equipment Leasing, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
SUN STUDS, INC. v. ATA EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC.,892 F.2d 73(Fed. Cir. 1989)
SUN STUDS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ATA EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC.,
APPLIED THEORY, INC. AND U.S. NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.,
DEFENDANTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Nos. 87-1509, 87-1515.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
December 20, 1989.
Don H. Marmaduke, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke Booth, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Barbee B. Lyon, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke Booth, Portland, Or., and William A. Birdwell, of Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson Young, Portland, Or.

David W. Axelrod, of Schwabe, Williamson Wyatt, Portland, Or., for defendants/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was Robert L. Harrington, of Portland, Or.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Oregon.
[1] ORDER
[2] Upon further consideration of the suggestion for rehearing in banc that was accepted on August 16, 1989,882 F.2d 1583, it now appearing that the acceptance was improvident,

[3] IT IS ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, declined. The court's opinion issued on March 31, 1989, appearing at872 F.2d 978, as modified by order on July 3, 1989, 872 F.2d 994, is reinstated.Page 1004