Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Mintz v. Barthelemy

Mintz v. Barthelemy, 891 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1989)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1989-12-22
Topic: general

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: Affirmed on the basis of the district court’s opinion at 722 F.Supp. 273 (E.D.La. 1989). AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mintz v. Barthelemy. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

MINTZ v. BARTHELEMY,891 F.2d 520(5th Cir. 1989)

DONALD R. MINTZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SIDNEY BARTHELEMY, WILLIAM J.

GUSTE, JR., IN HIS CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA,

AND THE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE ON CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE,

DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 89-3678.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 22, 1989.

Rehearing Denied January 24, 1990.

George C. Freeman, III, Phillip A. Wittmann, Richard C. Stanley, David K. Hall, Stone, Pigman, Walther, Wittmann, Hutchinson, New Orleans, LA., for plaintiff-appellant.

Morton H. Katz, Russ M. Herman, Herman, Herman, Katz Cotlar, Julian R. Murray and Okla Jones, III, City Atty., Murray and Braden, New Orleans, LA., for Barthelemy.

Dale Charles Wilks, New Orleans, LA., John Neely Kennedy, Sp. Counsel to the Governor, Baton Rouge, LA., Jeffery Mark Lynch, Louisiana Dept. of Justice, New Orleans, LA., for Guste.

Wilson Sexton, John Neely Kennedy, Sp. Counsel to the Governor, Office of the Governor, R. Gray Sexton, Executive Secretary, Louisiana Ethics Admin. Program,Page 521Baton Rouge, LA., for Supervisory Committee, etc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before THORNBERRY, JOHNSON, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

[1] Affirmed on the basis of the district court's opinion at722 F. Supp. 273(E.D.La. 1989).

[2] AFFIRMED.