Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Bekins v. Merced Irrigation District

89 F.2d 1002

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1937-04-12
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Upon motion of appellants for advancement of cause for hearing, and for reversal of decree of the District Court herein, and after oral arguments thereon, ordered said motion granted, that a decree be filed and entered reversing' the decree of said District Court, and remanding the cause with directions to dismiss the cause; mandate to issue in 40 days.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bekins v. Merced Irrigation District. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
BEKINS v. MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT,89 F.2d 1002(9th Cir. 1937)
Reed J. BEKINS et al., Appellants, v. MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al.,
Appellees.
No. 8165.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 12, 1937.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Northern Division; George Cosgrave, Judge.
Maurice Harrison, Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, tum Suden tum Suden, and Hugh K. McKevitt, all of San Francisco, Cal., Clark, Nichols Eltse, of Berkeley, Cal., W. Coburn Cook, of Turlock, Cal., Gillett Gillett, of Oakland, Cal., and Charles L. Childers, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Downey, Brand Seymour, of Sacramento, Cal., Hugh K. Landram and C. Ray Robinson, both of Merced, Cal., and Orrick, Palmer Dahlquist, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of appellants for advancement of cause for hearing, and for reversal of decree of the District Court herein, and after oral arguments thereon, ordered said motion granted, that a decree be filed and entered reversing the decree of said District Court, and remanding the cause with directions to dismiss the cause; mandate to issue in 40 days.Page 1003