Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Brown-Forman Corp. v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission
Brown-Forman Corp. v. Tenn. Alcoholic Beverage Comm’n, 883 F.2d 504 (6th Cir. 1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-08-31
- Topic
- general
ORDER Before KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and HACKETT, District Judge.* ON REMAND FROM the Supreme Court of the United States of America. UPON CONSIDERATION of the decision of that Court vacating the prior decision of this court, it is ordered that this cause be REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in light of Healy v. The Beer Institute, Inc., 491 U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 2491, 105 L.Ed.2d 275 (1989).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brown-Forman Corp. v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
BROWN-FORMAN v. TENNESSEE ALCO. BEVERAGE COMM.,883 F.2d 504(6th Cir. 1989)
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE COMMISSION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Nos. 87-5870, 87-5913.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
August 31, 1989.
L. Webb Campbell, Dearborn Ewing, and Robert L. Echols, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.
[1] ORDER
Before KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and HACKETT, District Judge.fn*
[3] UPON CONSIDERATION of the decision of that Court vacating the prior decision of this court, it is ordered that this cause be REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in light ofHealy v. The Beer Institute, Inc.,491 U.S. ___,109 S.Ct. 2491,105 L.Ed.2d 275(1989).Page 1265
- The Honorable Barbara Hackett, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. ↩