Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Lundblad v. Celeste

882 F.2d 207

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-07-21
Topic
bankruptcy

ORDER A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows: The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lundblad v. Celeste. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
LUNDBLAD v. CELESTE,882 F.2d 207(6th Cir. 1989)
STEVEN LUNDBLAD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. RICHARD D. CELESTE,
GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-APPELLEES, OHIO
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, DEFENDANT.
Nos. 87-3651, 87-3689.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
July 21, 1989.
Terrence M. Fay (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Environmental Enforcement Sec., Columbus, Ohio, for appellants.Page 208

Jeffrey Decile (argued), James Ayers' Law Office, Columbus, Ohio, for appellees.
Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
[1] ORDER
[2] A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.


[3] Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

[4] The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.