Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook
In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook, 873 F.2d 1406 (11th Cir. 1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-05-24
- Topic
- litigation
873 F.2d 1406 In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor. William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glynn H.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re William D. Kraemer, Debtor. William D. Kraemer v. Glynn H. Crook, Cynthia M. Crook. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor.
William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-8839
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 24, 1989.
Tash J. Van Dora, Savell & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Owen Forrester, Judge.
Before TJOFLAT, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of October 4, 1988. See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988).
AFFIRMED.