Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Clark v. United States

Clark v. United States, 856 F.2d 1433 (9th Cir. 1988)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-09-14
Topic
general

ORDER We affirm the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, which is reported in Clark v. U.S., 660 F.Supp. 1164 (W.D.Wash.1987).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clark v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

856 F.2d 1433

Mary CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 87-3967.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 3, 1988.
Decided Sept. 14, 1988.

1

William G. Cole, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant/appellant.

2

David R. Lord, Ferguson & Burdell, Seattle, Wash., for Ed Nojd et al.

3

G. Lee Raaen and Ann Cross Eschenbach, Seattle, Wash., for Mary Clark et al.

4

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding.

5

Before ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN,* district judge.

ORDER

6

We affirm the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion, which is reported in Clark v. U.S., 660 F.Supp. 1164 (W.D.Wash.1987).

*

Honorable Leland C. Nielsen, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation