Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Carlisle Lumber Co. v. Hope

Carlisle Lumber Co. v. Hope, 85 F.2d 1010 (9th Cir. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1936-09-21
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Upon motion of appellees, ordered appeal dismissed for failure of appellant to print record and file brief as required; mandate forthwith.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carlisle Lumber Co. v. Hope. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

CARLISLE LUMBER CO. v. HOPE,85 F.2d 1010(9th Cir. 1936)

CARLISLE LUMBER CO. v. Charles W. HOPE, etc.

No. 8159.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 21, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Washington, Northern Division.

Theodore B. Bruener, of Aberdeen, Wash., and Charles H. Paul, of Longview, Wash., for appellant.

Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C., J. Charles Dennis, U.S. Atty., Owen P. Hughes, Asst. U.S. Atty., and E.J. Eagen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Seattle, Wash., and Clifford D. O'Brien, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Portland, Or., for appellees.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of appellees, ordered appeal dismissed for failure of appellant to print record and file brief as required; mandate forthwith.Page 1011