Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

James HILL, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee

848 F.2d 1522

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-07-12
Topic
bankruptcy

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion April 11, 1988, 11 Cir., 841 F.2d 1533) Before KRAVITCH and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: Appellant Samuel Andrews has petitioned this court for rehearing of that part of our prior decision dealing with Mr. Andrews individually. See Hill v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 841 F.2d 1533, 1544 (11th Cir.1988).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James HILL, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
24 opinions
HILL v. METRO. ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTH.,848 F.2d 1522(11th Cir. 1988)
JAMES HILL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID
TRANSIT AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 85-8845.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 12, 1988.
Isabel Gates Webster, Gary W. Walker, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Paul A. Howell, Jr., Kutak Rock Campbell, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Robert L. Vining, Jr., Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion April 11, 1988, 11 Cir.,841 F.2d 1533)
Before KRAVITCH and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
[1] Appellant Samuel Andrews has petitioned this court for rehearing of that part of our prior decision dealing with Mr. Andrews individually.See Hill v. Metropolitan Atlanta RapidTransit Authority,841 F.2d 1533,1544(11th Cir. 1988). The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. Leaving all other portions of our opinion intact, we hereby delete those portions of our prior opinion discussing Mr. Andrews and insert the following in place of the fifteenth paragraph of Section III,841 F.2d at 1543:
Because the district court did not make a finding as to why the following plaintiffs were denied relief with respect to their applications for bus driver, we remand the cases ofDavid Johnson, CliffordMitchell,andAlvin Shortsfor an adjudication of their claims. We remandPage 1523the cases ofHarry TerrellandSamuel Andrewsfor a slightly different reason. Terrell applied June 1, 1979, and Andrews applied September 29, 1978. Their applications were rejected for no apparent reason. Although the district court found that Terrell became disabled in 1984 and suggested that Andrews became disabled in 1979, the court did not hold that there was any valid reason for the failure to consider these men initially. Accordingly, they may be entitled to damages for the failure to employ them before they became disabled.