Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Seawinds, Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V.

Seawinds, Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., 846 F.2d 586 (9th Cir. 1988)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1988-05-16
Topic: general

ORDER The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its opinion. See Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., 80 B.R. 181 (N.D.Cal.1987).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Seawinds, Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

SEAWINDS LTD. v. NEDLLOYD LINES,846 F.2d 586(9th Cir. 1988)

SEAWINDS, LTD., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEDLLOYD LINES, B.V.; ROYAL NEDLLOYD

GROUP, N.V.; KNSM LINES, B.V.; AMERICAN PRESIDENT COMPANIES, LTD.; AMERICAN

PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. SEA-LAND CORPORATION; SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.;

DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET AF 1912 A/S; A/S DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET SVENDBORG; A.P.

MOLLER-MAERSK LINE; HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; INTERCONTINENTAL

TRANSPORT (ICT) B.V., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 87-2363.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 14, 1988.

Decided May 16, 1988.

Thomas R. Fahrner, Michele C. Jackson, Michael R. Hudson (Furth, Fahrner, Bluemle Mason), San Francisco, Cal., for Seawinds, Ltd.

M. Laurence Popofsky, Peter A. Wald, Andrea G. Asaro (Heller, Ehrman, White McAuliffe) and Charles S. Donovan (Walsh, Donovan, Lindh Keech), San Francisco, Cal., for Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., Royal Nedlloyd Group, N.V. and KNSM Lines, B.V.

William I. Edlund, Walter R. Allan, John F. McLean (Pillsbury, Madison Sutro), San Francisco, Cal., for American President Companies, Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.

Terry M. Gordon (Lasky, Haas, Cohler Munter), San Francisco, Cal., and Robert S. Zuckerman, for Sea-Land Service, Inc.

Stanley O. Sher, Marc J. Fink, Kelly A. Knight (Dow, Lohnes Albertson), Washington, D.C., and Gary S. Anderson (Farella, Braun Martel), San Francisco, Cal., for A.P. Moller-Maersk Line, Hapag-Lloyd A.G., Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 A/S and A/S Dampskibsselskabet Svenborg.

Nathan Lane III, Ralph M. Pais, James B. Nebel (Graham James), San Francisco, Cal., for Intercontinental Transport (ICT) B.V.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its opinion.See Seawinds Ltd. v.Nedlloyd Lines, B.V.,80 B.R. 181(N.D. Cal. 1987).Page 587