Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of Laborers

832 F.2d 1164

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1987-11-19
Topic: general

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of Laborers. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

MESA VERDE v. N. CAL. DIST. COUN. OF LABORERS,832 F.2d 1164(9th Cir. 1987)

MESA VERDE CONSTRUCTION CO., PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE, v. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MESA VERDE CONSTRUCTION CO., PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE, v. CARPENTERS 46 NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA COUNTIES CONFERENCE BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Nos. 85-1665, 85-2074.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 19, 1987.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] Upon the vote of a majority of the nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.Page 1165