Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Commissioner v. Jones

82 F.2d 329

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1936-03-11
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Following the decisions of this court in the cases of Commissioner v. Flem*330ing, 82 F.(2d) 324 (March 7, 1936), and Commissioner v. Williams, 82 F.(2d) 328 (March 11, 1936), the petition in the above numbered and entitled cause is denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commissioner v. Jones. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JONES,82 F.2d 329(5th Cir. 1936)
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Chester Adison JONES,
Respondent.
No. 7774.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 11, 1936.
Petition for Review of Decision of United States Board of Tax Appeals (District of Texas).
Helen R. Carloss and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Bruce A. Low, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., and Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Eustis Myres, of Dallas, Tex., Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tex., and Cecil A. Morgan, of Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent.
Before FOSTER, HUTCHESON, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Following the decisions of this court in the cases of Commissioner v. Fleming,Page 33082 F.2d 324(March 7, 1936), and Commissioner v. Williams, 82 F.2d 328 (March 11, 1936), the petition in the above numbered and entitled cause is denied.Page 338