Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Maccarone v. Pincus & Tobias, Inc.

82 F.2d 1015

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1936-04-20
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Decrees (11 F.Supp. 239, 248) affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Maccarone v. Pincus & Tobias, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

MACCARONE v. PINCUS TOBIAS, INC.,82 F.2d 1015(2nd Cir. 1936)

Fred MACCARONE and Del-Mac System Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

PINCUS TOBIAS, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. SBICCA METHOD SHOES, Inc.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. WOLF SONS, Inc., Defendants-Appellee.

Nos. 317, 316.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 20, 1936.

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Briesen Schrenk, of New York City (Hans v. Briesen and Fred A. Klein, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants Fred Maccarone and Del-Mac System Corporation.

Watson, Bristol, Johnson Leavenworth, of New York City (Clair V. Johnson, Davis A. Woodcock, and Harry A. Smith, all of New York City, of counsel), for Pincus Tobias, Inc., and Sbicca Method Shoes, Inc., appellant.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decrees (11 F. Supp. 239, 248) affirmed.