Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Larry Booker v. John Jabe, Warden, Kinross Correctional Facility
Larry Booker v. John Jabe, Warden, Kinross Corr. Facility, 801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1986)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1986-09-26
- Topic
- litigation
PER CURIAM. This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court “for further consideration in light of Allen v. Hardy, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986) and Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).” Michigan v. Booker, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 3289, 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Larry Booker v. John Jabe, Warden, Kinross Correctional Facility. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 30 opinions
BOOKER v. JABE,801 F.2d 871(6th Cir. 1986)
LARRY BOOKER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOHN JABE, WARDEN, KINROSS
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.
No. 83-1136.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued September 20, 1984.
Decided September 26, 1986.
Chari Grove argued, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner-appellant.Page 872
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. of Mich., Eric J. Eggan, Edgar L. Church, Jr. argued, Asst. Atty. Gen., Corrections Div., Lansing, Mich., for respondent-appellee.
Before MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges; and BELL, District Judge.fn*
[2] We therefore reinstate our previous opinion and judgment.
- The Honorable Samuel H. Bell, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ↩