Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

M. Binkovitz & Sons, Inc. v. The Manuel Arnus

M. Binkovitz & Sons, Inc. v. Manuel Arnus, 80 F.2d 1015 (2d Cir. 1935)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1935-12-16
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Decrees (10 F.Supp. 729) affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed M. Binkovitz & Sons, Inc. v. The Manuel Arnus. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

M. BINKOVITZ SONS v. THE MANUEL ARNUS,80 F.2d 1015(2nd Cir. 1935)

M. BINKOVITZ SONS, Inc., and General Olive Oil Corporation,

Libelants-Appellees, v. THE MANUEL ARNUS and Compania Trasatlantica

Espanola, Claimant-Respondent-Appellant. J.H. ROSSBACH BROS., Inc.,

Specialty Confectioners' Bakers' Supply Company, Inc., and H.L. Sherer,

doing business under the Trade-Name and Style of Yarritu Castile Soap

Importing Co., Libelants-Appellees, v. THE MANUEL ARNUS, her Engines,

Boilers, etc., Compania Trasatlantica, Claimant-Appellant.

Nos. 144, 145.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 16, 1935.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Hunt, Hill Betts, of New York City (John W. Crandall and Frank J. Zito, both of New York City, of counsel), for The Manuel Arnus and appellant Compania Trasatlantica.

Hill Rivkins, of New York City (Robert E. Hill and Barton P. Ferris, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees M. Binkovitz Sons, Inc., and General Olive Oil Corporation.

Bigham, Englar, Jones Houston, of New York City (Alfred Ogden, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees J.H. Rossbach Bros., Inc., and others.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decrees (10 F. Supp. 729) affirmed.