Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Overton v. City of Austin

Overton v. City of Austin, 798 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1986)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1986-08-22
Topic: bankruptcy

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded to the *151district court for reconsideration in the light of Thornburg v. Gingles, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2752, 92 L.Ed.2d 25 (1986).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Overton v. City of Austin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

OVERTON v. CITY OF AUSTIN,798 F.2d 150(5th Cir. 1986)

VOLMA OVERTON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, ERNESTO CALDERON, ET AL.,

INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES,

BLACK CITIZEN'S TASK FORCE, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE.

No. 85-1269.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 22, 1986.

Finkman, Van Os, Waterman, Dean Moore, David Van Os, Austin, Tex., for Overton, et al.

Mexican Amer. Legal Defense Ed. Fund, Jose Garza, Judith A. Sanders-Castro, San Antonio, Tex., Belinda Herrera, Austin, Tex., for Calderon, et al.

Steve Bickerstaff, Ann Clarke Snell, City Atty., Austin, Tex., for Austin, et al.

Terry Davis, Austin, Tex., for Black Citizen's Task Force.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; James R. Nowlin, District Judge, Presiding.

Before WISDOM, REAVLEY, and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded to thePage 151district court for reconsideration in the light ofThornburg v.Gingles,___ U.S. ___,106 S.Ct. 2752,92 L.Ed.2d 25(1986).