Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Baer v. Norene

Baer v. Norene, 79 F.2d 340 (9th Cir. 1935)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1935-09-09
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree in 1917; later, in 1919, he was convicted of knowingly uttering a forged bank check; and still later, in 1921, was convicted of forgery of an indorsement on a check. The only contention raised by the appellant is that these crimes do not involve moral turpitude and therefore cannot form the basis for deportation. It is clear that these offenses involve moral turpitude. The order of the lower court denying the applicatio'n of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Baer v. Norene. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
BAER v. NORENE,79 F.2d 340(9th Cir. 1935)
BAER v. NORENE, Divisional Director of Immigration.
No. 7890.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
September 9, 1935.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; James Alger Fee, Judge.

Habeas corpus proceeding by Walter Baer against Roy J. Norene, Divisional Director of Immigration for the District of Oregon. From an order denying the application for the writ, the petitioner appeals.

Order affirmed.
Irvin Goodman, of Portland, Or., for appellant.Page 341

Carl C. Donaugh, U.S. Atty., and Hugh L. Biggs, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree in 1917; later, in 1919, he was convicted of knowingly uttering a forged bank check; and still later, in 1921, was convicted of forgery of an indorsement on a check. The only contention raised by the appellant is that these crimes do not involve moral turpitude and therefore cannot form the basis for deportation. It is clear that these offenses involve moral turpitude.

The order of the lower court denying the application of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.