Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gabriel Salgado Fuentes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Gabriel Salgado Fuentes v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 779 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1985)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-12-23
- Topic
- bankruptcy
ORDER Upon a vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn. 765 F.2d 886.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gabriel Salgado Fuentes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
FUENTES v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERV.,779 F.2d 29(9th Cir. 1985)
GABRIEL SALGADO FUENTES, PETITIONER, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE, RESPONDENT.
No. 83-7662.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 23, 1985.
Dept. of Justice, Marshall Tamor Golding, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, and BRUNETTI.
[1] ORDER
[2] Upon a vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.765 F.2d 886.